Current:Home > ContactKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Golden Horizon Investments
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-18 22:02:15
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (23)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- 'All of Us Strangers' is a cathartic 'love letter' to queer people and their parents
- More stunning NFL coach firings to come? Keep an eye on high-pressure wild-card games
- MILAN FASHION PHOTOS: Simon Cracker’s upcycled looks are harmonized with dyeing. K-Way pops color
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Judge orders Trump to pay nearly $400,000 for New York Times' legal fees
- Spoilers! Why 'American Fiction' ends with an 'important' scene of Black representation
- Two Navy SEALs are missing after Thursday night mission off coast of Somalia
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Louisiana woman grew a cabbage the size of a small child, setting record for massive produce
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Abdication in our age: a look at royals who have retired in recent years
- CVS closing dozens of pharmacies inside Target stores
- Horoscopes Today, January 12, 2024
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- A man is charged in a 2013 home invasion slaying and assault in suburban Philadelphia
- Florida's immigration law brings significant unintended consequences, critics say
- NFL playoff picks: Can Tyreek Hill, Dolphins stun Chiefs in wild-card round?
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Ranking Packers-Cowboys playoff games: From Dez Bryant non-catch to Ice Bowl
'All of Us Strangers' is a cathartic 'love letter' to queer people and their parents
Nico Collins' quiet rise with Texans reflects standout receiver's soft-spoken style
Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
Horoscopes Today, January 12, 2024
Who is Kalen DeBoer, Nick Saban's successor at Alabama? Here's what to know
Want to watch Dolphins vs. Chiefs NFL playoff game? You'll need Peacock for that. Here's why.