Current:Home > MyRead the Colorado Supreme Court's opinions in the Trump disqualification case -Golden Horizon Investments
Read the Colorado Supreme Court's opinions in the Trump disqualification case
View
Date:2025-04-16 09:09:18
Washington — In a stunning decision that could have major ramifications for the 2024 presidential election, the Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that former President Donald Trump is disqualified from holding office again and ordered the secretary of state to remove his name from the state's primary ballot.
The court paused its decision until Jan. 4, one day before the deadline for certifying the candidates for the state's March 5 primary, and said the pause will remain in place if Trump asks the U.S. Supreme Court to review the decision by then. Trump's campaign has said he will do just that, meaning his name will likely remain on the state's March 5 primary ballot after all.
- What to know about the Colorado Supreme Court's Trump ruling, and what happens next
Still, the decision by the Colorado Supreme Court's 4-3 majority tees up a high-stakes showdown in the U.S. Supreme Court over the constitutional provision at the center of the case, one that could threaten Trump's eligibility for the presidency if the high court rules against him. The Colorado court determined that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, known as the insurrection clause, bars Trump from holding federal office due to his actions in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.
"We conclude that because President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three, it would be a wrongful act under the Election Code for the Secretary to list President Trump as a candidate on the presidential primary ballot," the court's majority wrote.
The Colorado Supreme Court's opinion in the Trump case
In their 133-page opinion, the four justices in the majority acknowledged that "we travel in uncharted territory, and that this case presents several issues of first impression." Justices Richard Gabriel, Melissa Hart, Monica Márquez and William Hood formed the majority.
The justices rejected claims from Trump's lawyers that the breach of the Capitol by his supporters on Jan. 6 was not an insurrection and instead concluded that the record in the case "amply established that the events of January 6 constituted a concerted and public use of force or threat of force by a group of people to hinder or prevent the U.S. government from taking the actions necessary to accomplish the peaceful transfer of power in this country."
Read their full majority opinion here:
The majority found that Trump "did not merely incite the insurrection," but "continued to support it" by continuing to urge then-Vice President Mike Pence to unilaterally toss out state Electoral College votes.
"These actions constituted overt, voluntary, and direct participation in the insurrection," the majority wrote.
The justices wrote that accepting Trump's argument would mean the secretary of state is powerless to remove someone who doesn't meet the Constitution's other requirements to become president.
"Were we to adopt President Trump's view, Colorado could not exclude from the ballot even candidates who plainly do not satisfy the age, residency, and citizenship requirements of the Presidential Qualifications Clause of Article II," they wrote. "It would mean that the state would be powerless to exclude a twenty-eight-year-old, a non-resident of the United States, or even a foreign national from the presidential primary ballot in Colorado."
The minority's dissenting opinions in the Colorado Trump case
The three justices who were in the minority — Chief Justice Brian Boatright and Justices Carlos Samour and Maria Berkenkotter — each wrote their own opinions dissenting with the ruling. They each took issue with various portions of the court's opinion, and expressed concerns about what they saw as a lack of due process for denying Trump's access to the primary ballot.
In his dissent, Boatright said that the section of Colorado's election code under which the case was brought "was not enacted to decide whether a candidate engaged in insurrection."
Samour wrote that the decision to bar Trump from the primary ballot "flies in the face of the due process doctrine." The litigation in the case, Samour continued, "fell woefully short of what due process demands."
Berkenkotter wrote that she disagreed with the majority's conclusion that the state's election code "authorizes Colorado courts to decide whether a presidential primary candidate is disqualified" under Section 3, and warned that the majority's "approach seems to have no discernible limits."
Stefan Becket is assistant managing editor, digital politics, for CBSNews.com. He helps oversee a team covering the White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, immigration and federal law enforcement.
TwitterveryGood! (5865)
Related
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- World Talks on a Treaty to Control Plastic Pollution Are Set for Nairobi in February. How To Do So Is Still Up in the Air
- Lessons From The 2011 Debt Ceiling Standoff
- Scientists Join Swiss Hunger Strike to Raise Climate Alarm
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- These Bathroom Organizers Are So Chic, You'd Never Guess They Were From Amazon
- The Senate's Ticketmaster hearing featured plenty of Taylor Swift puns and protesters
- 8 Simple Hacks to Prevent Chafing
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- FAA contractors deleted files — and inadvertently grounded thousands of flights
Ranking
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- Global Efforts to Adapt to the Impacts of Climate Are Lagging as Much as Efforts to Slow Emissions
- Thom Browne's win against Adidas is also one for independent designers, he says
- How Dying Forests and a Swedish Teenager Helped Revive Germany’s Clean Energy Revolution
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- See Chris Evans, Justin Bieber and More Celeb Dog Dads With Their Adorable Pups
- Bank of America created bogus accounts and double-charged customers, regulators say
- If You Hate Camping, These 15 Products Will Make the Experience So Much Easier
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
Cold-case murder suspect captured after slipping out of handcuffs and shackles at gas station in Montana
Inflation is easing, even if it may not feel that way
Al Pacino and More Famous Men Who Had Children Later in Life
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
Inside Clean Energy: Coronavirus May Mean Halt to Global Solar Gains—For Now
What tracking one Walmart store's prices for years taught us about the economy
Two U.S. Oil Companies Join Their European Counterparts in Making Net-Zero Pledges